Posibility to lower the vulneranility of workers

Status
Not open for further replies.

DeletedUser1105

So, you said:

then the account he is pushing ends up in prison so it is actually counter-productive to a cheat
Click to expand...

and I was pointing out that THIS proposal mentions nothing of a jail option, so the player would not end up in jail.
 

DeletedUser

Meh, bounties good, but possibilities of abuse are still present.

EDIT:

I like this one myself Ulthor, but the angles for abuse is obvious here.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

DeletedUser

I like this one BUT as has been pointed out it is more open to abuse, so it will fall at that hurdle.
 

DeletedUser

MutliAccount 'players' do not socialise, ****'em to be honest, they can't ruin our fun.
Basically- STOP USING THAT FOR EVERY SINGLE REASON NOT TO HAVE SOMETHING.
*ahem*
Sorry for that.

Anyway...a way to limit this could be to have it so a person cannot have a bounty from the same 'town' of people within 5-7 days, this means a player or players of one town cannot misuse this by making several people attack someone over and over.
It does mean that the players can disband and go to another town...but that would be a total waste of time, but if someone is willing enough to do that then there would be a logical reason as to why.

There should also be two bounties.
Personal Bounties
and
Commercial Bounties

Personal- Comes straight from one persons wallet.
Anyone in a town with a Mortician can make a Personal Bounty

Commercial- Comes from Town Treasury.
Only the town founder and possibly councillor can make a Commercial Bounty.

the 5-7 day rule applies for Commercial and Personal.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

DeletedUser

Sorry to rain on the parade, if you guys would go to the other bounties thread and post the developments there. I don't like having duplicate threads :)
Locked
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top