And yet, I was rank one BEFORE Westforts came out.
This is seen, as after me and Godsarseii had imported ALL the battles in the world prior to that point, my name was on the top - so how could I possibly have point *****d my way to the top - not knowing where I actually stood in the rankings?
About Vengyr, I think what you write is extremely shameful.
Vengyr goes out of his way to fight alongside GC in many battles, and this is how one of his allies talks about him?
YOu should show some respect to your teammates, as he is constantly turning up and tanking for you, would you like to be slated by the people you help?
All that I know about Vengyr's actions recently, is that he too wants full, even fort battles - I have not read anything of what he might have said to people. And there is no way in hell that Vengyr is subservient to me, we are friends and treat each other as equals. As I believe everyone should in this game.
Major battles ARE NOT only on weekends, if anything the full battles happen midweek, where there are little to no multis.
I cannot reply to one point of you message, as I respect TP's wishes, so i'll forget that was even posted.
And yes, I am blaming MissB.
I had told her that I wanted no more multis, and yet they persisted.
I did not "back stab her", all I did was change allegiance, and make it known to the populace. Back stabbing infers that I went out of my way, crippling her behind her back.
Now, as this is a game - I do not believe it is right to just sit back, one must act on one's morals and go for it. Plus I know that I am not the only one who feels the same way about the multi battles, they are hated universally throughout all worlds on the-west.net, and many times have they been argued against.
For this world alone i may drop the accusations but that still is pretty much your job as a fort fighter especially seeing as fort fighters need to have good rankings (i.e high levels).
I tried to give vengyr respect throughout my limited mentioning if his in forum posts, and i said how i had nothing against him or his player - only the manner in which he claimed to be supporting GC, as you said, but basically completely agreed with you. Though dont worry i see the reasoning as to why you would do your best to paint me in the worst light.
My only mentioning of the word subservient was in relation to your use, although looking at the posts and not knowing about you in game or in other circumstances it looks like hes pretty subservient.
Not true. THERE ARE PLENTY OF FULL BATTLES, THEY HAPPEN ALL THE TIME and you cant deny that when its
simply true. Banana town alone has $120000+ yet what will that be spent on? nothing. Now im not saying that i think all the town treasury should be spent on is fort battles and that i dont think it should change but that doesnt make any difference!
Real classy, im not ashamed of what i wrote and your being a ver slippery person, not in a good way
Im
SORRY that GC doesnt follow your every word and only exists to serve you OAN but i dont think you should expect this alliance built up of dozens of towns and hundreds of players to have to be under your will.
You back stabbed, thats something thats true and you wont use your slippery tongue to get out of, evidence 1: this forum - would you like me to quote some of whats written on the earlier pages?
By you. The people who have argued against them are ONLY the ones who disagree. We have our right to multi battles just as you have your right to have filled battles, which i also enjoy. I guess were just more tolerant.
Besides this idea of tactical battles and mis/information really adds and actual element of strategy to the game where the individual players are actually the soldiers and strategic decisions must be made. Much more realistic.
Hated universally? Perhaps within the users of this forum my self exempt but its a little crass to claim that everyone in the universe agrees with you.