DeletedUser
put a sock in it Gyoza :dry:
- Status
DeletedUser
Currently no fort battles have been initiated.
peace
peaceDeletedUser
Why are you always so rude?
DeletedUser
Actually It's not so balanced
Defender is OVER FEED
I participate already at 10+ battles and attacker never won it :/
Yes I know that there is won battles for the attacker in many worlds but when attackers are twice more or high levels
I talk about 10+ big battles type 128 vs 128 or 100+ vs 100+
Maybe it need more tests and refix because If someone make a statistic about the fort battles in all worlds - I'm sure that DEF won 80+% of them
It's not so complicated to check statistic like this - result of all fort battles in all worlds until now with 200+ players
And if there is 80% vs 20% DEF vs ATT so it need a fix
I actually think a 80% vs 20% split for defenders seems like it's about where it should be. Defenders should have a big advantage, especially if they have built up the defenses of the fort. Taking over a fort should be a difficult task and not a mere 50/50 proposition.
DeletedUser
because of gyoza of course
DeletedUser
DeletedUser
I'm only rude to a few people .. him being the main one.
DeletedUser
It must be love.
DeletedUser
Yea, that has to be it. That or an ulcer.
DeletedUser
the imbalance between attackers and defenders could be due to factors other than game mechanics, the prime one being game skill.
Hypothesis - One to Three towns band together and organise the construction of a fort. They communicate with each other to organise supply of rare items, who does the building, what gets built etc. Point - they are organsised.
Some town wombles past and thinks "hmmm .... looks good .... might take a punt at that" and calls for a fort battle. Then they don't bother organising any thing. Most of the 3 battles I have been in, it appeared that the attackers were a motley crew who randomly wandered in the battle to be part of it. Point - they are not organised.
I think the main reason the attackers lose is they are lacking in strength and organisation.
Hypothesis - One to Three towns band together and organise the construction of a fort. They communicate with each other to organise supply of rare items, who does the building, what gets built etc. Point - they are organsised.
Some town wombles past and thinks "hmmm .... looks good .... might take a punt at that" and calls for a fort battle. Then they don't bother organising any thing. Most of the 3 battles I have been in, it appeared that the attackers were a motley crew who randomly wandered in the battle to be part of it. Point - they are not organised.
I think the main reason the attackers lose is they are lacking in strength and organisation.
DeletedUser
DeletedUser
He's an ulcer :laugh:
DeletedUser
What's with all the name calling? What did i ever do to you?
DeletedUser15560
DeletedUser
[[back on topic]]
the attacker-defender win ration is about
10%-90%
the attacker-defender win ration is about
10%-90%
DeletedUser
[[back on topic]]
the attacker-defender win ration is about
10%-90%
Can you tell me what country was formerly known as Siam? I hear you're very knowledgeable on such subjects.
DeletedUser
Siam = Myanmar (its my neghibouring country )
)DeletedUser
Wrong answer chief.
DeletedUser
its correct comrade
DeletedUser
It's Thailand, brosef. Google it. I guess I was wrong. You're not very knowledgeable on such subjects.
- Status