And I don't see the real difference between an FRP DM who does a ton of extra work to make sure the players are entertained, and a moderator who tries to keep the game fun for the players.
No comparison whatsoever. Those FRPs are not for profit, do not have player accounts, handle very small groups, only deal with a few incidents, if any, a week, and are for the most part very personalized relationships.
Ingame moderators are recruited from the player base, are dealing with a for-profit product, manage +20,000 accounts, deal with 20 to 100 incidents a DAY, with each moderator having to ban 5 to 50 accounts every single day (following policy, not whim).
The fact that drama-filled stink results from two banned accounts out of every 2,000 banned accounts is, in my opinion, rather acceptable numbers. Once again, it's what you don't see, as a player, that leaves you grossly ignorant of what it is we VOLUNTARILY manage and deal with. If that offends you, unfortunately I'm calling it as it is.
And here's the problem with the situation. A moderator has much more responsibility in a game than anyone else. They really need to be seen as above reproach and as objective as possible. It's not about having the right to play, it's about having the right to play and moderate the same server at the same time.
The problem with allowing those who moderate to play on the servers they're moderating is it both creates huge temptation to use/abuse the powers (not that I'm saying that's what happened) but more importantly, can make it seem like that's what is happening by other players.
You know nate, this sort of pisses me off, as I already answered your question on this in a ticket two days ago, and therefore find your post here to be deliberately misrepresentative:
Hello natepaul76,
The allegations posed on my actions as a moderator are patently false. Ingame moderators do not moderate the worlds they play in. < etc >
The response I provided was more detailed, but that's the gist of what's important to address in response to your above post. The fact you were already informed, and decide to represent this once again, shows malice.
As it is, there are account-specific violations and there are world-specific violations. In the case of an account-specific violation, a global ban may be imposed, due to the fact the issue is with the accounts themselves. In the case of a world(s)-specific violation, the person may be banned on that respective world only. If a person has an account-specific violation a global ban results in that person being banned on all worlds they play. If an instance occurs whereby a moderator has a character in a specific world where a globally banned person also has an account, it could give the IMPRESSION that the ingame moderator is moderating that world, but that is simply NOT the case.
Once again, the vast majority of players simply do not know the schema here, and thus do not know how it is things are managed by the moderators. This is as it should be, for any information provided can and will be used by those who wish to exploit the system.
Where you at hellstromm? I enjoy a challenge, and the bent bulls haven't been much fun to fight lately.
I have been busy of late, and thus put my character in w11 to do jobs until my schedule clears up a bit. Besides that, however, I'm not part of Bulls Bend, and was merely hired for a time to try and iron out some of their wrinkles. Their team needs a bit of work, as far as trusting leadership, but time will eventually work that issue out and their skillz will increase along with that trust.