Wrong on several points. It is not our responsibility to police your members or make you verify veracity of charges. Your Sheriff has stated in his bio that anyone who attacks Eagles gets attacked. That is that.
You seem to have failed to actually read what I wrote about Chief. (Just to clarify, his name is legal.) Either go back, read it, and come up with an arguement, or just drop it and I'll know your finally starting to open your eyes to the truth. I can't know exactly what each of my 200 players has done. If one of them is doing wrong to another town, it is that towns responsibility to let me know about the situation and seek an agreement, just as whenever a player has attacked our town and caused problems it is my responsibility to inform the leader of the attacking player's town.
What exactly is your definition of a worker? It seems to mean different things to different people depending on day of the week and humidity. I have farmed up tons of items for my town (look at the found items thread). I still get attacked and do not cry vengeance at a magic level where I can be uber. That is bok bok chicken talk.
Do not be evasive. If we are going to be accused of hitting workers before you did you better be able to back it up. I have not seen any evidence of that at all. The statement stands. Eagle justification for hitting our workers was a lie.
Read my last post on worker definition. To me, and many others, it has always been +5 dueling level for this world, which proves that the player has been dueling and winning, which to reach level 5 requires dueling stats. Righ already gave evidence in her post on which players had been attacked, such as MihaBrb. So yes, I can 'back it up'. You have so far not managed to back anything up. Hmm... hypocrite? I didn't say you should cry vengence, but if you want it to stop then the best way is to contact the other towns diplomat and sort it out. If that doesn't work, then you might declare or ignore it. If you did nothing then its your own fault.
So what you are saying is, you can farm big xp off people who you know cannot stand against you, just not if they are a worker? Yeah there is no real difference, is there? We are not going to play semantics here.
So what your saying is that there are higher level duelers who don't stand a chance? Im sorry, but if anybody is a dueler and that bad then they deserve to be beaten. Yes, there is no real difference. Neither can defend themselves. I was actually the one who persuaded Kitten to extend the -FoM-'s worker protection to adventurers for this very reason.
The adventurers are workers line will not fly, we were hit much earlier by Eagles types looking for xp and shrugged it off. You not doing the same is hypicritical.
No its not. Me
knowing we were hitting your adventurers, and deliberately allowing it would be hypocritical. Once again, its your own fault for not contacting me. That's like me saying somebody else had a bad dress sense, when I have a bad dress sense- its not hypocritcal if I admit it. Plus I pointed out why it would be more acceptable with our members hitting workers because of the lack of targets that we have compared to someone travelling to us and being able to hit plenty of duelers.
Let's be clear on something. We tolerated the occassional attack on our people as we were busy with other things. A farm pattern appeared. We raised a concern and it was ignored. We sent a message. Next we are accused of hitting workers.
You didn't raise a concern, you just openly stated you were going to hit workers and the only thing you were going to allow seemed to be for us to never hit your players, including duelers. Hence why I offered to tell Tirion who was the only player you said was causing a problem to die his attacks down, but that Righ would have to accept the occasional duel as he is a dueler. Would you have had any problems with that? You then hit workers (proven).
Now, I guess you could call a pure soldier a worker under your loose definitions but whatever, we have yet to see proof. Then your people hit our actual worker class type worker. The kind that everyone seems so keen on having a no duel clause. Builders. Third down on character class selection.
Workers are still workers to us, whether builder or adventurer, and I have proved why they are workers. As for soldier workers, thats just stupid (although beleivable, apparently I've been avoided simply by putting 'I r builder, leave me be' sarcastically on my profile. Some people -ey?) and any player who goes for a class like that and expects not to be hit deserves to be.
The bottom line here is simple. We do not care about getting attacked or getting knocked out in the course of play. What will not stand is you trying to justify attacks the way you have. You can shoot us but we cannot shoot you in action here. Trying to twist the rules entirely in your favor. Are we in charge of your PR or policing your members? No. We will simply shoot. You are responsible for the actions of your members. What people say and do have consequences.
I have already said how rediculous this is to make as a point, and this kind of play is is whats caused you so many problems. One account to control, the rest I have to rely on, and I can't know from 200 players if one of them is hitting a town a bit too much. I also showed that I am not a hypocrite, and that you seem to just adore that word so much you'll try and alter people's actual decisions to call someone it. I did not at any point say that you were not allowed to duel any of my townsmen (don't even bother making a Chief Smelly point, I already disproved that was a valid point) and that we were allowed to duel all of yours, or that it was acceptable for us to hit less dueling able and not for you to, it would be unacceptable of us had we not been hit first and I would make sure, I
have made sure when this has happened, that that is not the case. Hence, not a hypocrite.
Oh, and I would lay off calling Xanthippe a liar about the contents of your towns. It looks like 2 have 0 workers and 1 contains the worker/duelers you are trying to sneak past us all. I cannot be bothered to click on every single town and neither can she.
The message was sent to Cheif Smelly, I checked under his town, he has players defined as workers. So yes, I am calling Xan a lyer. And the best part is, the whole of the -FoM-, by their dueling guidelines, agree with me. That makes about 50 to 1? (Yes, 50 is exaguratting, but im not going to count.)
